The most serious piano teachers will adamantly point their students in
the direction of an acoustic piano. For serious piano studying, I agree
with this completely for reasons I will discuss shortly. But for many
reasons, a genuine handcrafted instrument may not be the best choice for
you. With the affordability, portability, and the many features that
come with digital pianos, you may wish to head the other way. Summarily,
the question of acoustic versus digital boils down to a matter of
authenticity versus everything else.
Mostly, the drawbacks of an acoustic piano are matters of practicality,
such as price. For what you could get a new, decent quality digital
piano with, you’ll be dealing with a rather meager acoustic. This can
encompass a number of problems. For instance, aside from any tuning it
might need, the overall sound quality of a cheap acoustic piano can be
quite poor. This may not just be an issue of old strings, but can result
from an infinite number of possible factors arising from any of the
complex mechanics of the piano being in disrepair. Other common problems
of old pianos are broken keys and sticky keys, which is when the keys
fail to spring up the way they should. There may also be faults with the
framework that can range from nuisances to impending hazards. The
trouble of a bad acoustic continues indefinitely, and the piano may need
a decent amount of initial maintenance, in addition to periodic
maintenance, which is likely to pull a few additional large bills out of
your wallet right way.
Also, because of its bulk and weight, an acoustic may be a very
difficult accommodation for people living in tight or elevated spaces,
such as dorm rooms and certain city apartments. Some buildings may even
prohibit pianos, particularly on floors above the ground level because
the weight and bulk of pianos make them quite cumbersome and possibly
hazardous to either the tenants or the buildings themselves. This raises
the issue of portability as well. Do you gig? Do you relocate
frequently? Toting a 500 pound upright piano isn’t possible for most
people; moving one across the room is a challenge for most people. If
your music needs to be ready to go, your hulking wooden companion is not
going to be sympathetic.
Acoustic pianos also lack the many features present in digital pianos
nowadays that may be valuable tools to you. For example, volume control
may be necessary in dormitory, or close living, situations. Newer
digitals also come with a suite of onboard functions, including
on-the-fly recording, voice customization, electronic metronome, and
even music mixing features, which you won’t have. You will also lack the
benefit of porting your music to your PC; a simple MIDI connector would
feed your performance directly into your computer’s audio card without
any ambient noise or loss of sound quality, which will probably beat any
recording made with an acoustic piano and consumer grade recording
hardware available at a neighborhood electronics store.
With an acoustic, you will surely be at, at least, some degree of
inconvenience. Still, despite the great deal of effort digital piano
makers have put into their product, none have been able to truly
reproduce the sound and feel of a good acoustic piano. First, lets talk
about the piano sound. To most people, casual or occasional listeners of
piano music, the resulting sounds between an acoustic piano and a
digital piano are quite identical and equally satisfactory musically.
But listen closely, because there is an important difference.
A digital piano outputs high quality recordings of the sounds that were
made by a real piano at one time. During the process of making a digital
piano, each key of a real concert grand piano is struck a number of
times at varying velocities and recorded with sophisticated equipment to
be used as the digital voice. This will give the digital piano a
sufficient range of tonality and an overall likeness to the sound of an
acoustic piano in varying music dynamics. But once the notes have been
recorded and finally integrated with the digital piano’s voicing
mechanism, they are never going to be changed. Even though the aesthetic
quality of the sound is state of the art, it is the way the sounds
should behave but cannot because they are fixed recordings that is the
fundamental problem of digital pianos.
An acoustic piano uses a complex array of hammers, strings, a
soundboard, and other moving parts that function in collaboration. This
means that when any note is played, it is not played with entire
independence, but is highly affected by the current state of the
surrounding components of the piano. For example, playing a chord on a
digital piano will simply result in three notes being played, as they
were recorded individually, at the same time, whereas with an acoustic
piano, the three notes will interact with each other through the
soundboard and become a stew of vibrations, producing a different, more
complex, and ultimately richer sound. Lacking this quality, what comes
out of digital speakers will typically be quite boring and
unsatisfactory to aficionados of the true piano tone.
An acoustic piano is also an analog instrument, which means is has
virtually infinite range. For example, there is no limit to the loudness
or softness a note may be played on an acoustic piano. With digital
pianos, there is a point at which a minimum or maximum will be achieved.
This means there will be occasions when you will not be able to play a
note as softly or as loudly as you wish. In order words, true pppp or
ffff are probably beyond the reach of digital pianos without you
resorting to adjusting the volume dial while you’re performing. Even if
you were to do that, the tonal quality of the notes would remain static
from that point on, when it would further continue to dull or brighten
on an acoustic piano.
Another problem of digital devices is the matter of intervals. In
photography, for example, pixels are the intervals. With a traditional
film camera, the amount of detail you are able to capture is
theoretically unlimited because film is a single and continuous
malleable body. The “film” of a digital camera is not single or
continuous but is a multitude of pixels, each of which is only able to
record a solid block of color. The amount of detail a digital camera is
able to capture will depend on the how small the pixels are and how
tightly they’re packed together. If the pixels, or intervals, are small
enough and packed tight enough, the amalgam of the blocks of color they
record will appear to be smooth curves and gradients to the human eye.
There is a similar issue of intervals with digital pianos, which is
mainly the issue of touch sensitivity. Digital pianos have a finite
number of intervals when it comes to key pressure. The more intervals
there are and the closer they are to each other, the more realistically
the piano will respond to your dynamics. High end digital pianos will
have quite a lot of them. But digital pianos within the means of average
shoppers may not have sufficient sensitivity. This means that while the
vast difference between piano and forte may be noticeable, the most
intricate variances of touch pressure may be disregarded. This will be
quite a nuisance to pianists seeking a highly responsive instrument,
particularly when it comes to meticulous classical music.
It also manifests in pedaling. Piano pedals are ranged. Between simple
on and off, or up and down, there are degrees. Half-pedaling and
quarter-pedaling are crude terms describing the manner of pedaling in
which the pedal is only pressed partially down in order to create an
intermediate effect. For instance, rather than completely depressing the
pedal so that the full brilliance of a note is sustained, you may wish
to depress it only half way to dampen about half of the note and let
only the remainder of it sustain for a subtler, suppressed quality.
Certainly a scrupulous pianist will wish to employ the complete range of
pedaling available to him, which may not be represented entirely
accurately in a digital piano.
Aside from sound, as mentioned previously, key touch is also an
important issue. Digital piano makers these days have gone to great
lengths to reproduce the feel of acoustic pianos. For the most part,
they’ve done a good job. They’ve even gone as far as implementing graded
hammer action, which is in line with the hammers of acoustic pianos
gradually becoming lighter from left to right. As a matter of fact, if
you could take a look at the inner workings of a digital piano, you
would be quite surprised and impressed with the complexity of the hammer
mechanics. However, as long as digital pianos look the way they do,
being the shape and size they are, there is going to be a limit as to
how authentically the key feel can be made.
The hammers on a digital piano are simply extensions of the pianist’s
fingers. When the pianist presses a key down, it will raise the opposing
lever, which touches the electronic pad inside the piano that serves as
the string. The hammers on an acoustic piano do not behave this way.
Instead of being extensions of the pianist’s fingers, they are rather
like projectiles that are sprung toward the strings high above them.
Imagine the carnival game where you must hit a pad on the ground with a
mallet, which flings a projectile up the meter towards the bell at the
very top. The finger is the mallet, the visible piano key is the pad,
the hammer inside the piano is the projectile, and the string is the
bell. First of all, this means if you press a key all the way down but
not with the minimum amount of force needed, the projectile hammer will
never leave its seating and the string will actually never be struck.
Secondly, this launch-pad-like action feels quite different than the
seesaw-like action of digital piano hammers.
The only way this can truly be reproduced in a digital piano is by the
use of bona-fide acoustic hammers. And there’s nothing wrong with doing
that. But the problem is there isn’t enough room for them inside the
compact size of most of the digital pianos today. That’s why as long as
they look the way they do, the action of digital pianos will not feel
completely akin to that of acoustic pianos. Larger, higher end models do
integrate the acoustic hammer action simply to recreate the key feel.
Even higher end models, which are called “silent pianos,” integrate
strings as well and are bona-fide acoustic pianos with the added ability
to remove the strings from the action and toggle on digital mode in
order to provide volume control! But these tend to be even more
expensive than acoustic pianos.
These are the basic points to think about when shopping for your piano.
To restate what I said at the beginning of the article, it really boils
down to the authenticity versus everything else. And the authenticity is
usually going to cost you more to get. What you should think about is
how important it is to you that the piano truly resembles an acoustic.
Are you a classical piano student looking at a long road of perfection
and possibly a career as a concert performer? Then a digital piano is
probably not what you want to be practicing on, even as a temporary
substitution. I would suggest taking financing an acoustic and using
your relatively small budget of cash as the down payment. If this is not
necessarily what you’re going for, then perhaps a digital reduction is
all you really need. For most people, it is.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar